A-43, Lajpat Nagar-2, New Delhi-24 (India) | 011-29830000, 011-29840000 | +91-989-111-44-44, +91-8468-000-000 | Email: [email protected]

Pendency of dispute can’t be construed for recovery proceeding under section 33C(2) of the ID Act

2019 LLR 605 PATNA HIGH COURT Hon’ble Mr. Shivaji Pandey, J. CWJC No. 5192/2013, Dt/–11-4-2019 Nawal Kishore Singh vs. The State of Bihar and Others   A. INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 – Section 33A – Scope of – Petitioner had filed an application under Section 33-C(2) of the Act which was decided in favour of […]
This content is only available to Subscribers. Subscribe here. Already a member? log in
Close Menu