.
 

.

 

   

 
JUDGMENTS OF OCT. 2011

 

  • Challenging termination after accepting VRS dues only on refund.
    LLR Supreme Court 1009
  • Fixed-term employees not entitled to regularization.
    LLR Bom. HC 1059
  • Principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ not to apply for casual workers.
    LLR Del. HC 1080
  • Transfer of an employee not to be interfered by the Court.
    LLR All. HC 1084
  • An enquiry can be interfered only when there is perversity.
    LLR MP HC 1049
  • Contract labour system exploits workers.
    LLR Supreme Court 1079
  • Provident Fund Act will continue to apply even when the employees are reduced to less than 20.
    LLR Mad. HC 1074
  • Doctors being equal to God, not to issue false certificates.
    LLR Karn. HC 1043
  • Back-wages on reinstatement is not a rule of thumb.
    LLR Bom. HC 1020
  • An employee, performing managerial functions, not to be a workman.
    LLR Del. HC 1066
  • Reinstatement is proper when the employee was frightened to resign.
    LLR All. HC 1084
  • Compensation Commissioners require training in Judicial Academies.
    LLR Karn. HC 1043
  • Dismissal justified for levelling frivolous allegations against a senior officer.
    LLR Del. HC 1011
  • On transfer of establishment, vendee is also liable for provident fund dues.
    LLR Mad. HC 1074
  • Heart attack, resulting into death, is an accident for compensation.
    LLR Ker. HC 1071
  • After accepting the dues, VRS can’t be challenged.
    LLR Supreme Court 1009
  • Appeal, not writ petition, is the remedy for challenging the order of EPF Authority.
    LLR Del. HC 1082
  • ‘Wages’ under I.D. Act include travelling concession etc.
    LLR Guj. HC 1092
  • No limitation for application under section 33C (2) of the I.D. Act.
    LLR Guj. HC 1092
  • Consequential relief on reinstatement mean back-wages on higher post.
    LLR P&H HC 1090
  • Notice of voluntary retirement can be withdrawn before the effective date.
    LLR Guj. HC 1096
  • Globalization/liberalization can’t be at the cost of human exploitation.
    LLR Supreme Court 1079
  • Employer has to contradict the list of employees given by provident fund authority.
    LLR Del. HC 1013
  • No regularisation of a workman in the absence of specific reference.
    LLR Bom. HC 1020
  • Compensation is appropriate when a daily-wager raised dispute after 10 years.
    LLR Bom. HC 1023
  • Bank guarantee will be acceptable as pre-deposit for appeal before EPF Tribunal.
    LLR Del. HC 1018
  • Retrenchment justified when the Department is shut down.
    LLR Del. HC 1016
  • A resignation not containing allegations of ‘frustration’ can’t be withdrawn.
    LLR Karn. HC 1046
  • Acceptance of voluntary retirement is always at discretion of the Management.
    LLR Karn. HC 1046
  • Retrenchment compensation appropriate when permission not taken.
    LLR Mad. HC 1028
  • Purchaser will not pay the arrears of provident fund of earlier owner.
    LLR HP HC 1032
  • Removal of the bank officer, for granting extra loan, will not be set aside.
    LLR All. HC 1036
  • Ex-parte order by EPF Tribunal is to be set aside.
    LLR Bom. HC 1052
  • Back-wages can’t be denied because of agricultural income.
    LLR Bom. HC 1055
  • Check-off facility to a union already allowed cannot be stopped.
    LLR Mad. HC 1076
  • No relief to workmen who failed to prove 240 days of continuous work.
    LLR Bom. HC 1059
  • Back-wages not justified when the workmen failed to establish unemployment.
    LLR Bom. HC 1059
  • Reinstatement even to a daily wager is proper in the absence of enquiry or compensation.
    LLR P&H HC 1086
  • High Court has limited powers with the order of the Tribunal declining to accord approval for dismissal.
    LLR Del. HC 1113
  • Awarding exorbitant compensation without appreciating evidence is not proper.
    LLR Karn. HC 1043
  • A Judge must be conscious of human suffering and human feeling.
    LLR AP HC 1105
  • Interest on back-wages is justified.
    LLR Guj. HC 1092
  • After conducting the enquiry into the misconduct it can’t be contended that workman was temporary.
    LLR Bom. HC 1020
  • Disciplinary Authority can change its views after receiving explanation to the show-cause notice.
    LLR MP HC 1049
  • Accident compensation can be claimed either in civil suit or under Employees’ Compensation Act.
    LLR MP HC 1050
  • Various factors are relevant for granting relief to a terminated workman.
    LLR All. HC 1024
  • Reliance by Labour Court, on zerox copies of the documents, is erroneous.
    LLR Bom. HC 1059
  • Rejecting compensation claim, on technical grounds, would result in great injustice.
    LLR AP HC 1105
 

.


  • An employee cannot be retired in the absence of specific clause in the appointment letter.
  • If the terms and conditions are not specified in the appointment letter, an employee will note be bound to abide by subsequent conditions.
  • Before availing leave, an employee has to apply and get it sanctioned.
  • When an employee is appointed for a fixed period, no notice or compensation will be payable on his termination.
  • An employee cannot be transferred only when there is a specific clause in the appointment letter.
  • Once a benefit is extended to an employee, it cannot be withdrawn by the employer.
  • House Rent Allowance and overtime payment does not attract provident funds contributions.
  • Absence/late coming, when habitual will justify dismissal from service.
 
         

Copyright © 2006 Labour Law Reporter. All rights reserved
This Website is Mentained by Webnet International