.
 

.

 

   

 
JUDGMENTS OF AUG 2011

  • Removal of bank employee is proper when found guilty of financial irregularities.
    LLR Supreme Court 857
  • Reinstatement can’t be denied merely because no prescribed procedure was adopted for recruitment.
    LLR Supreme Court 785
  • Termination of a probationer even after 240 days will not be retrenchment.
    LLR All. HC 799
  • An employee unauthorisedly retaining employer’s accommodation can’t have gratuity.
    LLR Mad. HC 834
  • Conveyance and special allowance to attract provident fund contributions.
    LLR MP HC 867
  • Conveyance, Education, Medical, City Compensatory and Special Allowances, Food Concessions, Special Holidays, Night Shift Incentive will attract provident fund contributions.
    LLR Mad. HC 876
  • An ex-parte Award cannot be set aside after 30 days of its publication.
    LLR Del. HC 792
  • Compensation is appropriate when the workman has worked only for 3 years.
    LLR P&H HC 794
  • Transfer of a Technician in the same category not illegal.
    LLR All. HC 834
  • Minimum wages are guaranteed irrespective of paying capacity of the employer.
    LLR Del. HC 827
  • Reinstatement is erroneous when workman's service was terminated for habitual absence.
    LLR Jhar. HC 847
  • Reinstatement is not automatic for non-compliance of section 25-F of the I.D. Act.
    LLR Pat. HC 830
  • Government can’t adjudicate but only refer a dispute.
    LLR P&H HC 859
  • High Court is not to interfere with an Award by setting aside the punishment.
    LLR Uttr. HC 797
  • Back-wages on reinstatement are not automatic.
    LLR P&H HC 820
  • No accident compensation when the deceased fell from roof away from the establishment.
    LLR Karn. HC 804
  • Reduction in wages, without notice will not be proper.
    LLR P&H HC 818
  • Part-time junior executive with administrative functions is not a ‘workman’.
    LLR AP HC 801
  • Contract Labour (R&A) Act not applicable upon National Physical Laboratory not being an industry.
    LLR Guj. HC 813
  • Employees’ Provident Funds Act will be applicable on establishment employing 23 employees.
    LLR Pat. HC 807
  • Ex-parte order by PF Commissioner, without hearing, is not proper.
    LLR Bom. HC 851
  • Gratuity is a valuable right of an employee under the Payment of Gratuity Act.
    LLR Mad. HC 834
  • An aggrieved party under B&OCW Cess Act can file appeal, not writ in High Court.
    LLR All. HC 849
  • A person has to produce appointment letter or other supporting documents to prove to be an employee.
    LLR Del. HC 824
  • Striking off name is proper if the workman was habitually absenting.
    LLR Jhar. HC 846
  • Setting of establishment by purchasing machines only will be the new one for provident fund purpose.
    LLR Mad. HC 863
  • Insurer will not be liable to pay compensation on death of auto rickshaw driver not having driving licence.
    LLR AP HC 872
  • In writ jurisdiction, the High Court will not set aside/alter the findings of the EPF Appellate Tribunal.
    LLR Mad. HC 876
  • Division Bench will not interfere with the order of reinstatement.
    LLR P&H HC 820
  • Back-wages on reinstatement are discretionary.
    LLR Guj. HC 811
  • Interpretation of statute should tilt in favour of whom it is enacted.
    LLR Pat. HC 807
  • Construction of residential house will be covered by Payment of Wages Act.
    LLR P&H HC 841
  • Dismissal for retaining key of the power house will be too harsh.
    LLR Bom. HC 822
  • A Government body can’t contend its inability to pay minimum wages.
    LLR Del. HC 827
  • Labour Court will not interfere in stoppage of increments.
    LLR Karn. HC 844
  • There is no distinction between a permanent and a muster roll employee for applicability of section 25-F of the I.D. Act.
    LLR Del. HC 791
  • Many factors to be considered for grant of back wages on reinstatement.
    LLR Guj. HC 811
  • Ex-parte proceedings under Payment of Wages Act can be set aside within 30 days.
    LLR P&H HC 841
  • Every employer has to pay wages in conformity with the minimum wages.
    LLR Del. HC 827
 

.


  • An employee cannot be retired in the absence of specific clause in the appointment letter.
  • If the terms and conditions are not specified in the appointment letter, an employee will note be bound to abide by subsequent conditions.
  • Before availing leave, an employee has to apply and get it sanctioned.
  • When an employee is appointed for a fixed period, no notice or compensation will be payable on his termination.
  • An employee cannot be transferred only when there is a specific clause in the appointment letter.
  • Once a benefit is extended to an employee, it cannot be withdrawn by the employer.
  • House Rent Allowance and overtime payment does not attract provident funds contributions.
  • Absence/late coming, when habitual will justify dismissal from service.
 
         

Copyright © 2006 Labour Law Reporter. All rights reserved
This Website is Mentained by Webnet International